Contents
Dynamic Resource
Management 1
Introduction..
2
Frequency of DRM
Use.
3
Impact on Critical Fire
Response.
4
Impact on Critical
Special Service Response.
8
Average Engine
Availability.
9
Financial Impact
9
Impact on Prevention
and Protection Activity.
12
Impact Other Resources
(mobilisations) 13
Preston Area
Impacts.
14
Blackpool Area
Impacts.
15
Blackburn Area
Impacts.
16
Burnley Area
Impacts.
17
1. Lancashire
Fire and Rescue Service (LFRS) has robust systems in place to
monitor, manage, and dynamically deploy our fire engines and
firefighters to respond to emergencies across Lancashire.
2. There are
58 fire engines and a number of specialist appliances in the county
however some are often unavailable due to many reasons: ongoing
incidents; training; maintenance; leave or sickness absence;
unavailability of on-call staff; and other operational reasons.
3. When there
is a crewing shortage, we take steps to keep a fire engine or
specialist appliance available, by bringing in firefighters from
other stations (we call this detaching) or on overtime.
4. With
improved technology and access to more comprehensive data, we now
have a greater understanding of fire risk across Lancashire. As a
result, we have changed this approach to ensure sufficient
resources are available in the areas that need them and reduce
unnecessary overtime.
5.
Firefighters who crew a second fire engine may be detached to
maintain the availability of a first fire engine somewhere else,
making that fire engine temporarily unavailable. This only occurs
when the first fire engine is available as well as other fire
engines in the area and this ensures we maintain a balanced level
of fire cover across the county.
6. This forms
part of a dynamic, risk-based approach to managing resources
effectively.
7. Lancashire
Fire and Rescue Service continually assesses and adjusts our
operational resources to ensure the best possible emergency
response across the county.
8. Using
technology, we can see at any given time where live incidents are
located, which fire engines are attending, which fire engines are
available, and which are temporarily offline for training,
maintenance, or crewing. This data is combined with five
years’ previous incident data to highlight community risk,
enabling us to position fire engines in precisely the locations
they are needed.
9. Every
decision we make is guided by our commitment to public safety.
Whether it is moving a fire engine to cover a neighbouring area or
investing in new technology, our goal is always the same: to ensure
that every community in Lancashire receives a timely and effective
emergency response.
10. The Dynamic Resource Management (DRM) policy came into effect
on 01 July 2025, it is a policy which provides steps which
can be taken prior to using overtime to fill shortfalls, such as
redistributing the crew from second fire engines at 2 pump
wholetime stations where there is adequate fire cover in the
area.
11. The four, two pump wholetime
stations within LFRS are Blackburn, Blackpool, Burnley, and
Preston. DRM will only be enacted if the first fire engine at that
station and neighbouring station(s) are available, the table below
highlights which engines must be available to enact DRM:
|
DRM Stations
|
Engines that must be available to enact DRM
|
|
Blackburn
|
Blackburn P1
|
Darwen
P1
|
|
|
Blackpool
|
Blackpool P1
|
Bispham
P1
|
South
Shore P1
|
|
Burnley
|
Burnley
P1
|
Nelson
P1
|
|
|
Preston
|
Preston
P1
|
Fulwood
P1
|
Penwortham P1
|
|
Engine
|
# DRM Q2
|
% DRM
|
|
Blackpool
|
40
|
22%
|
|
Preston
|
34
|
18%
|
|
Blackburn
|
22
|
12%
|
|
Burnley
|
28
|
15%
|
|
Total
|
124
|
17%
|
*Data from 01/07/25 –
30/09/2025
12.
DRM has been used a total of 124 times in Q2. 124 occasions out of
a total of 736 available shifts across the four stations in that
timeframe, representing DRM being enacted on 17% of available
shifts.
13. Critical fire incidents are defined as incidents that are
likely to involve a significant threat to life, structures, or the
environment. Our response standards, in respect of critical fires,
are variable and are determined by the risk map (KPI 2.1) and
subsequent risk grade of the Super Output Area (SOA) in which the
fire occurred. The response standards include call handling and
fire engine response time for the first fire engine attending a
critical fire, and are as follows:
14.When reviewing our critical fire response times and any impacts
since DRM has been initiated, there has been no detrimental impact
on any incident outcomes. In the current year, there have been
fewer fires in low and medium risk LSOAs and an increase in high
and very high risk LSOAs, when compared to the previous year.
Across the four stations where DRM is enacted, response times have
improved when compared to the same period last year, (by 20
seconds) in all but the low-risk category, though this remains
substantially under the 12-minute average response time target.
Since DRM was introduced at the start of quarter 2 (Q2), overall
response times at DRM stations have increased by 6 seconds compared
with Q2 2024, whereas response times across all stations over the
same period have increased by 20 seconds, highlighting that DRM has
not had substantial impacts on our ability to meet the published
response standards.
|
DRM Stations
|
|
|
Critical Fire
Response
|
Target
(Mins)
|
2024/25
|
2025/26
|
Previous Year to Date
|
Year to Date
|
|
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
|
|
L
|
12
|
07:41
|
20
|
07:57
|
16
|
07:07
|
11
|
08:42
|
12
|
07:48
|
36
|
07:56
|
23
|
|
|
M
|
10
|
06:23
|
51
|
06:03
|
44
|
05:46
|
45
|
06:09
|
44
|
06:14
|
95
|
05:57
|
89
|
|
|
H
|
8
|
06:13
|
11
|
05:39
|
9
|
05:21
|
14
|
06:11
|
10
|
05:58
|
20
|
05:42
|
24
|
|
|
VH
|
6
|
05:36
|
6
|
05:38
|
7
|
05:50
|
11
|
04:35
|
5
|
05:37
|
13
|
05:27
|
16
|
|
|
Overall
|
06:36
|
88
|
06:22
|
76
|
05:53
|
81
|
06:28
|
71
|
06:30
|
164
|
06:10
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackburn Station
|
|
Critical Fire Response
|
Target
(mins)
|
2024/2025
|
2025/2026
|
Previous Year to Date
|
Year to Date
|
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
|
L
|
12
|
10:21
|
4
|
09:29
|
3
|
07:12
|
3
|
10:10
|
6
|
09:58
|
7
|
09:11
|
9
|
|
M
|
10
|
06:36
|
16
|
06:32
|
13
|
06:46
|
12
|
06:20
|
21
|
06:34
|
29
|
06:30
|
33
|
|
H
|
8
|
05:49
|
3
|
05:55
|
2
|
03:38
|
1
|
05:11
|
2
|
05:51
|
5
|
04:40
|
3
|
|
VH
|
6
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
|
Overall
|
07:09
|
23
|
06:57
|
18
|
06:39
|
16
|
07:03
|
29
|
07:04
|
41
|
06:55
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blackpool Station
|
|
Critical Fire Response
|
Target
(mins)
|
2024/2025
|
2025/2026
|
Previous Year to Date
|
Year to Date
|
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
|
L
|
12
|
07:16
|
8
|
08:13
|
7
|
04:03
|
1
|
07:26
|
4
|
07:43
|
15
|
06:45
|
5
|
|
M
|
10
|
05:46
|
11
|
07:48
|
6
|
05:07
|
19
|
05:38
|
8
|
06:29
|
17
|
05:16
|
27
|
|
H
|
8
|
05:20
|
6
|
05:38
|
4
|
07:07
|
1
|
05:30
|
3
|
05:27
|
10
|
05:54
|
4
|
|
VH
|
6
|
05:26
|
4
|
05:31
|
3
|
05:19
|
8
|
04:35
|
5
|
05:28
|
7
|
05:02
|
13
|
|
Overall
|
06:03
|
29
|
07:10
|
20
|
05:12
|
29
|
05:42
|
20
|
06:30
|
49
|
05:24
|
49
|
|
Burnley Station
|
|
Critical Fire Response
|
Target
(mins)
|
2024/2025
|
2025/2026
|
Previous Year to Date
|
Year to Date
|
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
|
L
|
12
|
04:56
|
3
|
08:30
|
2
|
08:58
|
4
|
-
|
0
|
06:21
|
5
|
08:58
|
4
|
|
M
|
10
|
06:16
|
15
|
04:48
|
15
|
05:37
|
5
|
06:03
|
10
|
05:32
|
30
|
05:54
|
15
|
|
H
|
8
|
-
|
0
|
05:28
|
1
|
05:10
|
7
|
06:56
|
4
|
05:28
|
1
|
05:49
|
11
|
|
VH
|
6
|
03:09
|
1
|
04:00
|
2
|
-
|
0
|
-
|
0
|
03:43
|
3
|
-
|
0
|
|
Overall
|
05:53
|
19
|
05:08
|
20
|
06:15
|
16
|
06:18
|
14
|
05:30
|
39
|
06:17
|
30
|
|
Preston Station
|
|
Critical Fire Response
|
Target
(mins)
|
2024/2025
|
2025/2026
|
Previous Year to Date
|
Year to Date
|
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
|
L
|
12
|
07:51
|
5
|
06:02
|
4
|
05:34
|
3
|
06:49
|
2
|
07:02
|
9
|
06:04
|
5
|
|
M
|
10
|
06:57
|
9
|
06:16
|
10
|
05:52
|
9
|
06:26
|
7
|
06:36
|
19
|
06:07
|
16
|
|
H
|
8
|
09:29
|
2
|
05:29
|
2
|
05:37
|
5
|
07:56
|
5
|
07:29
|
4
|
06:47
|
10
|
|
VH
|
6
|
08:40
|
1
|
07:25
|
2
|
07:14
|
3
|
-
|
0
|
07:50
|
3
|
07:14
|
3
|
|
Overall
|
07:37
|
17
|
06:16
|
18
|
05:58
|
20
|
07:01
|
14
|
06:55
|
35
|
06:24
|
34
|
|
All LFRS Stations
|
|
Critical Fire Response
|
Target
(mins)
|
2024/2025
|
2025/2026
|
Previous Year to Date
|
Year to Date
|
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
|
L
|
12
|
08:51
|
20
|
09:02
|
16
|
09:07
|
11
|
09:21
|
12
|
08:57
|
36
|
09:14
|
23
|
|
M
|
10
|
07:00
|
51
|
06:54
|
44
|
07:05
|
45
|
07:07
|
46
|
06:58
|
95
|
07:06
|
91
|
|
H
|
8
|
07:12
|
11
|
06:35
|
9
|
05:37
|
14
|
06:38
|
14
|
06:53
|
20
|
06:07
|
28
|
|
VH
|
6
|
06:02
|
6
|
05:55
|
7
|
05:49
|
11
|
05:00
|
5
|
05:59
|
13
|
05:31
|
16
|
|
Overall
|
07:40
|
88
|
07:42
|
76
|
07:38
|
81
|
08:02
|
77
|
07:41
|
164
|
07:49
|
158
|
15.Critical special service incidents are non-fire incidents where
there is a risk to life, for example, road traffic collisions,
rescues, and hazardous materials incidents. For these incidents
there is a single response standard which measures call handling
time and fire engine response time.
|
|
 |
16.
When reviewing our critical special service response times and any
impacts since DRM has been initiated, there has been little impact
as a direct result of DRM. In Q2 2025, there were 204 critical
special service incidents within the 4 station areas where DRM
occurs. Since DRM was introduced at the start of Q2, overall
response times at DRM stations have increased by 52 seconds
compared with Q2 2024, whereas response times across all stations
over the same period have increased by 11 seconds. Whilst this is a
higher increase than overall, our response times remain
substantially under the 13-minute average response time target, and
our Key Performance Indicator demonstrates that performance levels
continue to be met since the introduction of DRM.
|
Critical SSC
Response
|
Target
(mins)
|
2024/25
|
2025/26
|
Previous Year to Date
|
Year to Date
|
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
Q1
|
Incs
|
Q2
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
mm:ss
|
Incs
|
|
Blackburn
|
13
|
08:12
|
66
|
07:54
|
56
|
09:01
|
53
|
09:09
|
61
|
09:05
|
114
|
08:16
|
98
|
|
Blackpool
|
06:47
|
56
|
06:40
|
47
|
07:38
|
62
|
06:48
|
52
|
07:15
|
114
|
09:05
|
114
|
|
Burnley
|
07:18
|
48
|
06:50
|
44
|
07:28
|
35
|
08:12
|
42
|
07:52
|
77
|
07:15
|
114
|
|
Preston
|
07:46
|
45
|
08:45
|
54
|
07:57
|
49
|
09:40
|
49
|
08:48
|
98
|
07:52
|
77
|
|
DRM Stations
|
07:32
|
215
|
07:37
|
201
|
08:03
|
199
|
08:29
|
204
|
08:16
|
416
|
08:48
|
403
|
|
LFRS Overall
|
08:22
|
716
|
08:36
|
690
|
08:38
|
666
|
08:47
|
681
|
08:29
|
1406
|
08:42
|
1347
|
17.
As highlighted at the start of this paper, not every fire engine is
always available due to various reasons. Robust performance
monitoring is in place through various KPIs, below is a breakdown
of average engine availability by month.
|
|
|
Apr 24
|
May 24
|
Jun 24
|
Jul 24
|
Aug 24
|
Sep 24
|
Oct 24
|
Nov 24
|
Dec 24
|
Jan 25
|
Feb 25
|
Mar 25
|
Apr 25
|
May 25
|
Jun 25
|
Jul 25
|
Aug 25
|
Sep 25
|
Available
|
|
Pumps Avail (OC)
|
21
|
21
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
23
|
22
|
24
|
24
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
22
|
|
Pumps Avail (WT)
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
25
|
25
|
25
|
26
|
|
Pumps Avail (All)
|
47
|
47
|
46
|
46
|
46
|
47
|
48
|
49
|
50
|
51
|
49
|
48
|
50
|
50
|
49
|
49
|
48
|
49
|
48
|
18. The average number of Wholetime fire engines available has
reduced by one from 01 July 2025, On-Call fire engine availability
has increased and whilst there is typically a drop in availability
over the summer periods, there is still a significant upward trend
compared to the 2024 summer period. Combined availability has
resulted in LFRS maintaining an average of 48 fire engines
available at any one time since DRM has been instigated, which is
higher than the average availability over the same period last
year.
19.Dynamic Resource Management aims to reduce the usage of overtime
and overall budgetary pressures. Once DRM is enacted and a fire
engine has been taken off the run, the remaining crew are
redistributed to fill shortfalls as required.
20.The number of overtime shifts/activities recorded in Q2 2025, is
56. This is compared with 778 in Q2 2024.
21.
56 overtime shifts across the three months represents a cost of
£24,166. For the same period in 2024, the overtime bill was
£289,342, this equates to a saving of £265,175. This
figure includes on-costs (such as national insurance) and is for
overtime shifts directly related to maintaining fire engine
availability. To enable direct comparison, one pay figure has been
used (2025), therefore the 2024 cost will be slightly over
reported.
22.Average detachments have been increasing year on year, and the
number of detachments has increased over the same period in 2025
compared to 2024. This is to be expected with DRM as staff are
detached to cover shortfalls at other stations. When staff go on
detachments overtime or time owing is incurred for travel to and
from each detachment. This is capped at a total of 3 hours and can
be taken as time or payment, the costs of detachments are
significantly less than a full overtime shift. Detached duty
payments for Q2 were £11,200. In 2024 the cost of detachments
in Q2 was £10,000 (equivalent including pay rise),
representing a 12% increase in 2025.
23.The actual numbers of detachments in Q2 2025 rose by 19% from
1197 in 2024, to 1420 in 2025. This shows that more firefighters
are choosing to take time rather than payment than in 2024, which
may ultimately have a detrimental impact on staff availability due
to taking this time back.
24.Enacting DRM and temporarily removing a resource from a two-pump
station for a shift is anticipated to reduce the available time to
complete prevention and protection activity. Overall, LFRS
operational crews carried out 20% less Business Fire Safety Checks
(BFSC) in Q2 2025/26 compared with Q2 2024/25, and 14% less Home
Fire Safety Checks (HFSC) over the same period. Stations eligible
for DRM have experienced a similar drop in BFSC numbers but a
substantial drop in HFSC numbers (-28%). It is anticipated that
enacting DRM will impact the activity at neighbouring stations due
to an increase in mobilisations. This appears to be supported, as
shown in the table below, DRM and neighbouring stations experienced
a similar drop in BFSC as other stations, but a drop of 22% in
HFSC, substantially greater than the overall reduction.
|
2024/25 – 2025/26 Q2 Comparison
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Stations
|
BFSC
|
HFSC
|
|
All Ops
|
-20%
|
-14%
|
|
DRM Stations
|
-17%
|
-28%
|
|
DRM & Neighbouring Stations
|
-18%
|
-22%
|
|
Non-DRM Stations
|
-23%
|
-9%
|
25.By
removing an appliance for a full shift, it is assumed that incident
activity (mobilisations) will increase for the remaining, and
neighbouring appliances.
As can be seen by the trend
lines (linear) in the chart below, incidents have been increasing
slightly year on year since 2018/19. Mobilisations have also been
increasing, but at a greater rate.
26.Beyond prevention activities, Lancashire FRS has little control
over the number of incidents which it faces annually (see
26). However, policy decisions can have an impact on the
number of mobilisations. One example is the Automatic Fire Alarm
(AFA) policy which has been amended over
recent years to remove non-life risk premises.
27.
Comparing Preston Q2 over the previous eight years, as expected,
Preston L50P2 has been mobilised 68 times less than expected;
whilst Preston L50P1, Penwortham L57P1 and Fulwood L52P1 have all
experienced increases in mobilisations, though only Preston L50P1
has been out of the expected range of deviation. Bamber Bridge
L53P1 has experienced a reduction in mobilisations, whilst within
the expected deviation, it is nonetheless surprising and
potentially indicates that Penwortham has picked up more of
Preston’s mobilisations than Fulwood. This may be attributed
to Fulwood being On Call at night.
|
Fiscal
Year
|
Quarter
|
L50P1
|
L50P2
|
L57P1
|
L52P1
|
L53P1
|
|
2018-2019
|
Q2
|
302
|
347
|
293
|
204
|
302
|
|
2019-2020
|
Q2
|
270
|
435
|
246
|
253
|
246
|
|
2020-2021
|
Q2
|
246
|
422
|
228
|
244
|
227
|
|
2021-2022
|
Q2
|
269
|
483
|
289
|
251
|
294
|
|
2022-2023
|
Q2
|
300
|
508
|
349
|
274
|
266
|
|
2023-2024
|
Q2
|
316
|
457
|
300
|
300
|
269
|
|
2024-2025
|
Q2
|
289
|
449
|
305
|
259
|
219
|
|
2025-2026
|
Q2
|
324
|
375
|
312
|
272
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg
2018/19-2024/25
|
285
|
443
|
287
|
255
|
260
|
|
Std Dev
2018/19-2024/25
|
22
|
47
|
37
|
27
|
29
|
|
Deviation
2025/26
|
39
|
-68
|
25
|
17
|
-24
|
28.
Comparing Blackpool area Q2 mobilisations over the previous eight
years, as expected, Blackpool L30P2 has experienced reduced
mobilisations at 77 fewer than average, which is over three times
the standard deviation. The majority of these mobilisations appear
to have been absorbed by L30P1 and Bispham L31P1, with South Shore,
St. Annes and Fleetwood all within expected activity levels.
Fleetwood L32P1 is the only appliance not at a DRM station in
Western area to have experienced fewer than average
mobilisations.
|
Fiscal Year
|
Quarter
|
L30P1
|
L30P2
|
L31P1
|
L32P1
|
L36P1
|
L37P1
|
|
2018-2019
|
Q2
|
265
|
370
|
253
|
165
|
171
|
261
|
|
2019-2020
|
Q2
|
208
|
387
|
231
|
198
|
160
|
278
|
|
2020-2021
|
Q2
|
215
|
416
|
270
|
217
|
151
|
298
|
|
2021-2022
|
Q2
|
223
|
422
|
210
|
222
|
186
|
384
|
|
2022-2023
|
Q2
|
232
|
413
|
231
|
211
|
199
|
365
|
|
2023-2024
|
Q2
|
220
|
370
|
211
|
195
|
144
|
286
|
|
2024-2025
|
Q2
|
230
|
362
|
256
|
160
|
149
|
284
|
|
2025-2026
|
Q2
|
316
|
314
|
290
|
177
|
166
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg
2018/19-2024/25
|
228
|
391
|
237
|
195
|
166
|
308
|
|
Std
Dev 2018/19-2024/25
|
17
|
23
|
21
|
23
|
19
|
44
|
|
Deviation
2025/26
|
88
|
-77
|
53
|
-18
|
0
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.
Comparing Q2 mobilisations in Blackburn and neighbouring stations
over the previous eight years, in Q2 2025/26 Blackburn L71P2 has
experienced less than average mobilisations, but at 16 less than
average, this is well within standard deviation. All other stations
have had expected numbers of mobilisations, with Darwen L76P1
receiving the greatest increase.
|
Fiscal Year
|
Quarter
|
L71P1
|
L71P2
|
L76P1
|
L70P1
|
|
2018-2019
|
Q2
|
250
|
498
|
193
|
366
|
|
2019-2020
|
Q2
|
217
|
434
|
175
|
345
|
|
2020-2021
|
Q2
|
207
|
429
|
165
|
358
|
|
2021-2022
|
Q2
|
214
|
472
|
220
|
382
|
|
2022-2023
|
Q2
|
289
|
516
|
269
|
467
|
|
2023-2024
|
Q2
|
242
|
442
|
190
|
336
|
|
2024-2025
|
Q2
|
244
|
426
|
185
|
421
|
|
2025-2026
|
Q2
|
255
|
444
|
231
|
384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg
2018/19-2024/25
|
238
|
460
|
200
|
382
|
|
Std
Dev 2018/19-2024/25
|
26
|
33
|
32
|
43
|
|
Deviation
2025/26
|
17
|
-16
|
31
|
2
|
30.
Comparing Q2 mobilisations in Burnley and neighbouring station over
the previous eight years, Burnley L90P2 has received 69 fewer
mobilisations than average, almost double the standard deviation
for that appliance. Burnley L90P1 was mobilised 42 times over the
average, 13 over the standard deviation. Nelson, L94P1 has
experienced only two incidents over the expected average. It is
hard to identify any other stations/appliances which have
experienced an increase in mobilisations due to DRM at Burnley.
|
Fiscal Year
|
Quarter
|
L90P1
|
L90P2
|
L92P1
|
L94P1
|
|
2018-2019
|
Q2
|
202
|
322
|
73
|
259
|
|
2019-2020
|
Q2
|
184
|
377
|
67
|
220
|
|
2020-2021
|
Q2
|
145
|
318
|
65
|
228
|
|
2021-2022
|
Q2
|
182
|
327
|
53
|
293
|
|
2022-2023
|
Q2
|
230
|
427
|
66
|
297
|
|
2023-2024
|
Q2
|
154
|
313
|
42
|
253
|
|
2024-2025
|
Q2
|
195
|
348
|
36
|
237
|
|
2025-2026
|
Q2
|
227
|
278
|
54
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avg
2018/19-2024/25
|
185
|
347
|
57
|
255
|
|
Std
Dev 2018/19-2024/25
|
27
|
38
|
13
|
28
|
|
Deviation
2025/26
|
42
|
-69
|
-3
|
2
|
